Multi-stakeholder Collaborative Issues Advice to States on Clean Power Plan

Author(s):

Post date: July 14, 2016

The Midcontinent Power Sector Collaborative has released the first of a series of white papers prepared jointly by representatives of electric utilities, cooperative and municipal power providers, merchant generators, environmental organizations, and state regulatory agencies and designed to help states make key decisions under the federal Clean Power Plan. 

Assuming it survives a pending legal challenge, the Clean Power Plan will require states to develop and submit plans to reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from power plants.  States that choose to implement mass-based emissions trading programs under the Clean Power Plan must decide how to distribute the “allowances” that are required for each ton of CO2 emitted and that represent the central feature of such an approach.

The Midcontinent Power Sector Collaborative’s first white paper, “Key Considerations for Making Allowance Distribution Decisions,” begins by exploring the possible goals states might have in mind when making allowance distribution decisions.  It then examines the economics of allowances, before examining the options for allowance distribution and the opportunities and challenges with each option.

Why do we care about allowance distribution?

Most states are expected to implement mass-based trading programs under the Clean Power Plan.  Under this approach, every covered power plant must measure and report its carbon emissions and periodically must turn in enough allowances to match its emissions.  Each state gets a prescribed number of these allowances for each year of the program, representing the amount of carbon dioxide that is collectively allowed from covered power plants in the state.  Because covered plants need allowances to operate, and they are limited in number, allowances have value, especially later in the program as the stringency increases.

The value of each allowance issued by each state under the Clean Power Plan depends on the demand for the allowances, but analyses to date have suggested the allowances may be worth between five and fifteen dollars each later in the compliance period.  The state of Minnesota, for example, would issue more than 27 million allowances in the first year of the program, which could translate to a total value of between $135 million and $405 million [in the first year of the program alone based on this estimated range of allowance prices].  Through allowance distribution decisions, state officials can make sure that consumers receive the full benefit of this allowance value.  So the decision a state makes on allowance distribution is very important.

The Collaborative observes the following key takeaways after discussing the allowance distribution issue:

  • A state’s optimal allowance distribution approach will depend on its goals and those goals may vary from state to state.
  • Because utility commission regulation of vertically integrated utilities is intended to benefit electricity customers, effective regulatory oversight of allowance allocations to vertically integrated utilities should benefit the utility’s customers.
  • Cooperatives and municipal power producers are not-for-profit entities that are controlled by their electricity consumers.  As a result, allowance allocations to cooperatives and municipal power producers at no cost should benefit their consumers.
  • Merchant generators are by definition not regulated by state utility commissions.  Absent contractual provisions to the contrary, allowances allocated to merchant generators at no cost will not benefit electricity consumers.  While merchant generators operate in most states, they are especially prevalent in restructured states.
  • States also may consider allocating allowances to load serving entities or auctioning allowances as other means of distributing allowances for the benefit of consumers. 
  • States that choose to allocate allowance value to energy efficiency, renewable energy or other purposes can choose among numerous options that could benefit consumers and provide economic benefits, including direct allocation to load-serving entities (including vertically integrated utilities in traditionally regulated states), project-based set-asides, and auctioning with investment of proceeds.   

ABOUT THE WHITE PAPERS
The Midcontinent Power Sector Collaborative white paper series is the work product of the Midcontinent Power Sector Collaborative, convened and staffed by the Great Plains Institute.  Participants were given an opportunity to review a draft or drafts of the white paper and their comments were taken into account before it was finalized.  Every effort was made to ensure that agreements among participants are reflected and that differing opinions are captured in the text as well.  To encourage candid exchanges and creative thinking, participants were assured that participation implied neither support nor opposition to the Clean Power Plan or its implementation by states, nor support or opposition to specific policy choices described in the papers.  Ultimately, the goal of the MPSC is to inform better public policy.

Click here to learn more about the series and here to learn more about the Collaborative.